[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Warning! WF Post

Subject: [at-l] Warning! WF Post
From: thornel@attglobal.net (W F Thorneloe)
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 13:41:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <000301c0f03a$31aaa410$29c25fcc@mircon>
References: <20010608114016.24437.qmail@web3201.mail.yahoo.com><4.2.0.58.20010608061207.00a9e330@mail.ptdprolog.net><5.1.0.14.2.20010608090033.0546c3d0@pop3.attglobal.net>

For the record, I am _not_ criticizing your position or statements on this. 
Quite the contrary. Your stewardship of this list is far different, and my 
comment about "dooms" is far too strong. I am not critical of other's 
position, as their feelings are valid and credible. I wish it would go 
away, and have a bit of background in dealing with similar conflicts 
professionally.

Please accept my apology for any insult to you regarding your work for our 
community.

Bill Thorneloe
OrangePenetant

At 11:27 AM 6/8/2001 -0500, Ryan K. Brooks wrote:
>I think what you're referring to is my stated dislike of WF threads.   My
>basic problem with these threads is a personal one that started the day the
>ATML went on line.

References:
- [at-l] Warning! WF Post
  - From: orangebug74@yahoo.com (Orange Bug)
- [at-l] Warning! WF Post
  - From: kahley7@ptd.net (kahley)
- [at-l] Warning! WF Post
  - From: thornel@attglobal.net (W F Thorneloe)
- [at-l] Warning! WF Post
  - From: ryan@hack.net (Ryan K. Brooks)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Photos
Next by Date: [at-l] Mean-spirited Diatribe, WF and at-l
Prev by thread: [at-l] Warning! WF Post
Next by thread: [at-l] History (wasWarning! WF Post)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread