[at-l] Warning! WF Post

[thornel@attglobal.net (W F Thorneloe)]

You have a very good point. That is the killer in this problem. Setting an 
edict against the subject or announcing what the AT-L line is to be on the 
subject dooms us toward becoming another ATML. Yet blasting each other over 
continued respect for the <er, ah> character ain't so swift either. 
Maintaining such a focus on this character seems to make him more important 
than he is. <You're so vain, you probably think this song is about you> 
Heck, I'd rather meet Chip aka Leonard Woodcock than Dan.

This is not likely to go away anytime soon, and will continue to lend an 
air of tension about our little campfire. I'd rather discuss FSN or the 
color of the exudate of my burns. At least those topics smell better.

OrangeBug

At 08:13 AM 6/8/2001 -0500, kahley wrote:
>...  I find the insistence that we not discuss him, a tyranny in 
>itself.  It's just like