[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] The "Grits" Debate. Instant!

Subject: [at-l] The "Grits" Debate. Instant!
From: AThiker at smithville.net (Felix)
Date: Wed Jan 26 13:14:21 2005
In-reply-to: <41F7E189.6070809@starpower.net>
References: <fa.b6df006.2f290c15@aol.com> <001101c503c7$0ef9bbf0$0502a8c0@franks> <41F7E189.6070809@starpower.net>

Gary Ticknor wrote:

> Frank Looper wrote:
>
>> ...  I was under the impression that hominy either is or was a common 
>> side
>> dish north of the M|D line. Am I wrong here, or am I just laboring 
>> under old
>> info?
>
> I have never yet seen a Yankee relish either grits or hominy. Most 
> prefer grits to hominy, saying the one is bland and the other is gross.


Does this mean I get to send my story about 'hominy' again???  Yeah!!!

References:
- [at-l] Re: The "Grit" Debate
  - From: Bror8588 at aol.com (Bror8588@aol.com)
- [at-l] The "Grits" Debate. Instant!
  - From: mapster at charter.net (Frank Looper)
- [at-l] The "Grits" Debate. Instant!
  - From: garyticknor at starpower.net (Gary Ticknor)

Prev by Date: [at-l] The "Grit" Debate
Next by Date: [at-l] The "Grit" Debate
Previous by thread: [at-l] The "Grits" Debate. Instant!
Next by thread: [at-l] The "Grits" Debate. Instant!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread