[at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG

[ellen at clinic.net (Bob C)]

"In truth, though, in place of the words *cell phone*
you could insert any piece of gear and the statement wouldn't change."

For you perhaps, but not for all. A cell phone is different because it provides a two-way communication with the rest of the world -- well in places where it can find a signal anyway.

A cell phone is a link to civilization that changes the dynamics of the trail far more than a simple passive radio or a technical modern backpacking stove. Instant communication with the outside world is what has changed with the proliferation of the devices. 

Humans have always sought comfort in the wilds. Humans have always carried books and sought companions. A radio is simply a more technical and more up to date way of receiving information, while in wild places. Of course a radio is also a distraction, which is why I rarely carry one any more. But it is not the distraction a cell phone provides, or the crutch that a cell phone provides. Just the knowledge that 911 is just seconds away -- or may be if the location provides reception -- makes modern backpacking a significantly different experience. YMMV.

Weary