[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG

Subject: [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
From: jbullar1 at twcny.rr.com (Jim Bullard)
Date: Sun Jul 31 09:08:50 2005
In-reply-to: <20050731092235.695685614.ellen@clinic.net>
References: <20050731112904.25590.qmail@web51804.mail.yahoo.com> <1eb.4007b8e7.301db5ce@aol.com> <20050731112904.25590.qmail@web51804.mail.yahoo.com>

At 09:22 AM 7/31/2005 -0400, Bob C wrote:
>Perhaps we can all agree that a long hike with a cell phone is a different 
>experience than a hike without a cell phone.

Yep! When I get to town I don't have to ask if there's a public phone 
nearby. HUGE difference.

Follow-Ups:
- [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
  - From: ellen at clinic.net (Bob C)

References:
- [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
  - From: athiker89 at yahoo.com (Tim Rich)
- [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
  - From: RoksnRoots at aol.com (RoksnRoots@aol.com)
- [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
  - From: ellen at clinic.net (Bob C)

Prev by Date: [at-l] On topic if you carry a cell on the trail... OT if you dont... Imp...
Next by Date: [at-l] Appalachian Trail success!
Previous by thread: [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
Next by thread: [at-l] Cell phones VS Nature - An attempt to clarify - LONG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread