[at-l] Yankees (O.T.)

[camojack at comcast.net (Jack)]

Depends upon what you mean by end.

Psychologically, for a particular individual it could be Springer, or
Katahdin, or someplace in between.
(For some it never ends, just lives on inside of them)

Geographically, it's Springer, or Katahdin, depending upon where you
consider it begins.

Is it Philadelphia "Yankees" you're weary of, "Weary"?

Did I say, or somehow imply that I know more about Yankees than anyone in
particular, yourself included?

No. I merely pointed out that I didn't like the term when it's used
derisively and prejudicially.
(Kind of like what you did below with your comments about Philadelphians)

As for "getting real", there's an OLD saying about practicing what you
preach...

-"Camo"
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob C." <ellen@clinic.net>
To: "Jack" <camojack@comcast.net>
Cc: "Leslie Booher" <lbooher@pure.net>; <at-l@backcountry.net>; "Orange Bug"
<orangebug74@yahoo.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 9:01 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [at-l] Yankees (O.T.)


>"...I am trying to put an END to something..."

So good. Go for it. Tell us where is the "end" of the AT.

 Weary, who's getting tired of Philadelphia "Yankees," thinking they know
more
 about real Yankees than I do. I know nothing about Yankees, other than that
 they are unknowable. But that is more than any Philadelphian I've ever
heard
 about knows.

 Let's get real!!!

 Weary