[at-l] AT Trail system (was:Genuineness of ...........)

[spiriteagle99@xxxxxxxxxxx (Jim and/or Ginny Owen)]

Sly wrote:
>spiriteagle99@hotmail.com writes:
> > So - does anyone think it's not a viable idea to link those (and other)
> > trails as well as some of the presently being-built cross-connectors
>into a
> > single Appalachian Trail System?  C'mon - I want to hear the objections.
> >
>
>None from me, I think it's a fantastic suggestion!
>
>And I would think that multiple AT thru-hikers would or should agree.  The
>possibilities are endless, not just the same old hike over again.  Even
>with
>the new relos, the trail isn't going to change all that much or any
>further.
>
>I can see several hundreds perhaps thousands of miles included in the
>Appalachian Trail System without any new trail construction.


One thing I forgot to mention is that most of those trails already have
trail maintenance organizations in place and operating. And that many
(although not all) of them are already on "protected" land.  And that other
East-West cross-connectors/greenways are being built in PA.

Have a good day,
Jim



_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus