Re[2]: [at-l] Baxter vs AT

[Snodrog5@aol.com (Snodrog5@aol.com)]

>From Weary:"There's no doubt that the "irrational exuberance" of hikers 
completing a 2,000 mile walk conflicts with with the ultra conservative 
rangers, used to dealing with the typical "little old ladies in sneakers" 
that tend to camp in the Daicey pond cabins.
But I think rational people could probably work out a compromise if both sides
were willing to do so."
It's not just 2000 milers that caused conflict though. Lots of other hikers 
used the "AT" shelters that were at Daicey Pond.
It's too late to compromise, the shelters were removed two months ago!
TJ



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---