[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] thoughts on various hiking items, etc.
- Subject: [at-l] thoughts on various hiking items, etc.
- From: spiriteagle99@hotmail.com (Jim and/or Ginny Owen)
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 03:31:32 +0000
Desert Nomad wrote:
>Less pack weight means less stress on the body and the ability to hike
>more miles, and thus not have to carry as much food between town
>stops. It also means more enjoyment during the actual hiking, and a
>few less comforts when tenting or staying in a shelter. Also, lighter
>hiking footware is important to me. I read that a pound off your feet
>is like 5 off your back. I would go with trail runners which are more
>durable than sneakers, but lighter than hiking boots. Now thoughts on
>different items:
> 1. camera: not that essential, the long distance shots are not great
> unless a human is in the center of the photo and without one you
> don't need to deal with film and battery issues, etc.
Nomad -
Been reading Jardine, huh? S'OK - he has some good ideas - also some bad
ones, but you'll have to figure out which are which - for you. In general,
leaving the camera behind is one of the bad ones. 5 years after the hike
you'll wish you'd taken those pictures so you could remember what you saw.
Besides - what are you gonna show the family and friends when you get home?
:-)))
Trail runners - eat my feet - literally. Lightweight boots do fine. I use
Lowas. But that's a personal problem. Most people "can" use trail runners.
> 2. stoves: I would go without one. You also don't have to carry the
> pot, spoon, fuel bottle, etc. Note, this means a little added weight
>in food, but the hassle of cooking is out.
Some people go this way - sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.
Personal choice - and, as always, you get to live with the consequences
:-))
> 3. knife: not needed
Again - personal choice. But I find the knife too handy to leave behind.
<snip>
>10.tent: lightweight Eureka clip flashlight for me. Keeps me away from
> the snorers in the shelters and bugs. Also, great for privacy,
> warmth, and keeps me from losing items I would lose that I had
> scattered around a shelter. Also, I have more options where I can
> spend the night.
A Nomad is lighter. We used a Clip on the AT and then again on the CDT.
But we used the Nomad 2for2 on the PCT - now we don't want to give it up.
>11. Maps, data book, Wingfoot book, etc. are not needed, but I like the
>data book since it is light and helpful. Other hikers usually have >one if
>you have any questions.
None of them are indispensable on the AT. All of them are handy - as long
as you don't carry too much of them. But depending on other hikers is a bad
habit to get into. We've been too many places where there are no other
hikers to ask. Get in the habit of carrying your own information sources.
When/if you hike other long trails you don't need bad habits - they don't
work.
>12. mail drops: they are a big pain for the most part; lost mail, bad
>timing coming into town, being sick of food you have prepackaged
>are all problems. Most of the time you can hitch to a grocery store
>so don't worry too much about it.
LOL - no argument there -
>17. small pack: with less stuff a large, heavier pack is not needed
Thank you - I hear an echo.
>18. sunglasses and suntan lotion: not for me
That's what I said on the AT --- and ended up with precancerous skin
lesions. But I got smarter later - you REALLY don't want to blow those off
on the PCT - or the CDT.
Hey - welcome to the campfire/zoo. Hope you got a smashmellow.
Walk softly,
Jim
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com