[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [at-l] Re: at-l-digest V1 #1168
- Subject: Re: [at-l] Re: at-l-digest V1 #1168
- From: WHHAWKINS@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 15:07:20 EDT
In a message dated 6/11/99 9:59:54 AM EDT, PaddyBeer@aol.com writes:
<< One of the biggest dissapointments to me about the AT is just how easy the
half that I have done has been. Aside from a very small portion of the
trail, the path itself is, in my opinion, overkept and over easy. It
appears
more like a rugged jogging path now than a wilderness trail. >>
These messages ref to a at-l digest, make no sence. It Ref. something a lot
of us do not get. We get at-l messages as they come in (hot off the wire).
Digester's need to copy part of the digest they are ref. .
Sounds like memory fogged by too much beer. :-))
Wildbill
GA to ME 89
GA to ME to GA Mar 92 - Apr 93
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | http://www.backcountry.net *
==============================================================================