Re: [at-l] Sicko on the Loose on AT!!

[Big Bad Bob <rgiovann@idt.net>]

Tony Boselli wrote:
> 
> Sounds like you wouldn't mind joining your homeboy whhawkins in a
> welcome home party for Rudolph.
> 
> >From: DaRedhead@aol.com
> 
> >
> >You know, I think a little common sense should rule here.  While
> avoiding the
> >whole "abortion" topic, maybe I should point out that people who blow
> up
> >abortion clinics and/or people associated with them are not your run of
> the
> >mill serial killers or escaped convicts or even "heavily armed and
> dangerous"
> >types of people.______________________________________________________
>

this guy is also being sought for the Olympic bombing and one other.  
He is dangerous in any circumstances.  However, I agree with Wildbill
that he is not on the trail.  I understand they searched the Partnership
shelter area a while back because it was reported on one of the trail
journals.  If I were him I'd be far away.  but dangerous he is - suppose
he decides that hikers are evil and dangerous.    Next.... His thought
processes are not to be trusted.

Barbara

* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | For info http://www.hack.net/lists *

==============================================================================

---

• Prev by Date: Re: [at-l] Sicko on the Loose on AT!!
• Next by Date: [at-l] at-l -- a raison d'etre for having moderated lists?
• Prev by thread: Re: [at-l] Sicko on the Loose on AT!!
• Next by thread: Re: [at-l] Sicko on the Loose on AT!!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread