Forwarded... Ryan
-- BEGIN included message
- To: owner-at-l@saffron.hack.net
- Subject: BOUNCE at-l@saffron.hack.net: Non-member submission from [Dan Gould <ddgould@necc.org>]
- From: owner-at-l@saffron.hack.net
- Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 06:59:23 -0500 (CDT)
From owner-at-l Tue May 5 06:59:19 1998 Received: from mailnfs0.tiac.net (mailnfs0.tiac.net [199.0.65.17]) by saffron.hack.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA15392 for <at-l@saffron.hack.net>; Tue, 5 May 1998 06:59:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dan-gould (ddgould.tiac.net [207.60.53.146]) by mailnfs0.tiac.net (8.8.0/8.8) with SMTP id HAA10863; Tue, 5 May 1998 07:59:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <354EFE4B.437C@necc.org> Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 07:55:55 -0400 From: Dan Gould <ddgould@necc.org> Reply-To: ddgould@necc.org Organization: New England Center for Children (www.NECC.org) X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ryan K. Brooks" <ryan@inc.net> CC: at-l@saffron.hack.net, atml@trailplace.com Subject: Re: [at-l] Why at-l and atml? References: <4c949ddf.354e1078@aol.com> <354E1842.ABBE0224@fairchildsemi.com> <354E3A7F.D6AE6320@inc.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ryan K. Brooks wrote: > > If it makes more sense (and causes less confusion) I will take down the AT-L. No, no, no, don't take away AT-L! I think it's a critical forum for open, honest discussion and opinions. I've been a longtime subscriber to both lists, and think that they each have a unique character (and I don't mean Felix <vbg>). Big Blue Frog ...one section at a time...
-- END included message