[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [at-l] 'nother question
- Subject: RE: [at-l] 'nother question
- From: Ronald Moak <ronm@fallingwater.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Feb 1997 09:40:33 -0800
>what i'm wondering is this; my picture taking is not the same as most=20
>people's, i don't take pictures in order to preserve "the memory" of=20
>whatever the event is. i only take them in what i feel are beautiful=20
>situations, that would transfer well onto film. so the question is=20
>(finally :0), is there enough of the former to justify taking along my=20
>heavy camera, and film? the only people pictures are for other people=20
>(my mom, my friends, etc.). so would i take enough pictures, or would =
it=20
>just sit in my pack for six months?
Nater,
Take a camera!! Despite my desire for light weight, the cameras one =
item I consider an absolute must. Twenty years after the fact, when =
Linda and I sit down and review our slides, memories flood back far =
faster than reading our journals. =20
There are a number of small cameras that weight less than a pound that =
take good pictures (not the film/camera type). You don't need an SLR =
with lots of lenses to take good pictures.
Ron Moak
-----------------------------------------------< http://www.hack.net/lists >--
This message is from the Appalachian Trail Mailing List [AT-L]
To unsubscribe email at-l-request@saffron.hack.net with a message containing
the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the body. List admin can be reached at ryan@inc.net
==============================================================================