[at-l] No arguments. Gear and a Hike.

[camojack at comcast.net (camojack@comcast.net)]

"I apologize in advance for this on-topic post."
-Tin Man

Hee hee. From one aircraft mechanic to another...wouldn't you agree that we need the right AND left wing to fly?

Sorry if my reply to your decidedly ON topic post isn't...

-"Camo"

-------------- Original message -------------- 
> A quick question about boots. I have some Dunham Cloud 9's and love them 
> even if they are a bit heavy. I got them soaked and triedc to dry them 
> out last week but they didn't dry quick enough on the back porch and have 
> a mildew-y smell. What can I clean them with and how best to do it? 
> I apologize in advance for this on-topic post. 
> Tin Man 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> at-l mailing list 
> at-l@backcountry.net 
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l From infpeace at gmail.com  Mon Jun 13 04:46:06 2005
From: infpeace at gmail.com (Nina)
Date: Mon Jun 13 05:46:55 2005
Subject: [at-l] "Human crap"
In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20050613002852.00adacd8@mail.speakeasy.net>
References: <1c5.29de8ebd.2fde6097@aol.com>
	<5.2.1.1.2.20050613002852.00adacd8@mail.speakeasy.net>
Message-ID: <663a30de050613034673126af7@mail.gmail.com>

Awwww, I'm so disappointed. I thought this was gonna be a thread about 
poopin' in the woods.
 Waterfall
Member, Woods Poopers Anonymous

 On 6/13/05, Raphael Bustin <rafeb@speakeasy.net> wrote: 
> 
> At 12:07 AM 6/13/2005 -0400, RnR wrote:
> 
> >In a message dated 6/12/2005 8:04:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> >rafeb@speakeasy.net writes:
> >*
> >One is not many. And RnR represents
> >nobody but himself and the Holy Ghost
> >of Benton MacKaye.
> >*
> > If you took a deeper look into the AT and what it is that would be
> >disproven. Unfortunately most look for a quick defense reaction instead 
> of
> >considering that there's real Trail substance in that perspective. That's
> >why I
> >find this list extraordinarily shallow for an AT site that compliments 
> itself
> >on the depth, interesting-ness, and diversity of its members.
> >
> > The statement above is just plain false...
> 
> 
> 
> Can you claim to speak for anyone else, RnR?
> 
> What organization are you with? What official
> weight do your opinions carry?
> 
> If you mean to say that you live a world view in
> conformance with your notion of what Benton
> MacKaye said or thought or believed, that's
> another matter and I wouldn't argue the point.
> 
> I meant no offense by my comment, though
> I suppose it was a bit snarky. I apologize for that.
> I just don't agree that there's a standard, official,
> canonical version of What Benton Believed,
> nor do I accept without question your own
> pronouncements on that topic.
> 
> I have a huge regard for uncle Benton. He was
> a sage and a visionary, though I also believe he
> was crazy as a loon in some regards. He was
> way ahead of his time, I'll grant you that.
> 
> I agree with you that a proper discussion of
> Benton's "deeper intentions" is apparently not
> what the folks here want to talk about. Neither
> of us is going to change that, and you in
> particular hinder any such discussion by
> your authoritarian, dogmatic stance when such
> discussions do take place. It's your way or
> the highway, it seems.
> 
> I'm just here to find out more about a particular
> 160 mile section of Benton's masterpiece, but
> can't seem to drum up much interest in that, either.
> 
> 
> rafe b
> aka terrapin
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.6.9 - Release Date: 6/11/2005
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> at-l mailing list
> at-l@backcountry.net
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
> 



-- 
http://asortofnotebook.blogspot.com

Everywhere is within walking distance if you have the time.