[at-l] AT License Plate

[jbullar1 at twcny.rr.com (Jim Bullard)]

At 04:35 PM 4/25/2005 -0400, RoksnRoots@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 4/25/2005 7:47:41 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>jbullar1@twcny.rr.com writes:
>*
>I don't get this. Someone or some group was suing for the right to have a
>specialty plate on the grounds that another group was allowed to have one,
>the judge "threw the case out" (as in dismissed it) and that is a "victory
>for groups seeking to raise money via specialty tags"? I don't see how. It
>looks more like a defeat to me.
>*
>            The intent was to eliminate the specialty plate all together. The
>premise was, "if I can't have one nobody can". The judge rejected that and 
>the
>tags were allowed to remain a state program. If the judge ruled in their
>favor, that would be the end of all specialty plates.

Ah, now it makes sense, at least if you are a group that gets the state 
*stamp of approval*.