[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] the 'rules' - Pot (Trolling)
At 02:34 PM 4/18/2005 -0400, Steve Adams wrote:
>The Old RidgRunner,
>
>Reference your post, dated 04-18-05, "In my humble opinion the AT is not
>really wilderness, even in the politically designated 'Wilderness Areas.' "
>
>It seems to me, if a trail runs through it, it has lost its "wilderness"
>status.
In the Adirondack definition of 'wilderness', trails are accepted as a
feature that does not violate the concept. Trails existed before the
Europeans came here, Native American hunting trails and animal trails. That
did not stop us from considering the whole of the continent 'wilderness'
when we arrived.
I suppose in a purist sense for those who deny that humans are also
animals, wilderness could only be defined as totally lacking any evidence
of the presence of humans. In one of Cat Stevens songs there is a line
"There are no words that I can use because the meanings are left for you to
choose". Given the flexibility of meaning that he refers to I suspect we
each have our own definition of wilderness and mine may not be the same as
yours. I'm willing to accept trails through it both because it limits the
damage of human traffic to a specific corridor and because, when wilderness
travelers get into difficulty, it makes rescue more likely/easier if
they've stuck to the trail. YMMV
Saunterer the maintainer/S&R Volunteer
- Prev by Date:
[at-l] "Externality": Cell phones, cigarettes, nudity, sports broadcasts, drunkenness, wet dogs, body odor...
- Next by Date:
[at-l] "Externality": Cell phones, cigarettes, nudity, sports broadcasts, drunkenness, wet dogs, body odor...
- Previous by thread:
[at-l] the 'rules' - Pot (Trolling)
- Next by thread:
[at-l] Re: Giving It All Up
- Index(es):