[at-l] Cell Phones -- Perception

[jbullar1 at twcny.rr.com (Jim Bullard)]

At 08:23 PM 1/21/2005 -0500, Steve Landis wrote:
>On 1/21/2005 4:17 PM, RoksnRoots@aol.com wrote:
>
>>In a message dated 1/21/2005 4:12:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
>>jbullar1@twcny.rr.com writes:
>
>>On that, he and I agree.
>>
>>Maybe he has just had a reality check.
>
>>           Leave it to the internet "Trail Community" to suddenly accept 
>> WIngfoot when the opportunity to lessen wilderness ethics arises. I 
>> think that's the point. I can't help but see the internet community as 
>> determined to kill AT wildness (and those who support it) as an accepted 
>> cause. That's just the opposite of what the AT was formed for...
>
>Wow I think he's got you now Jim.  Let's see you get out of that one. 
>Things must slow over at whiteblaze.net

Agreeing with WF that cell phones are a courtesy issue rather than a 
destruction of wilderness issue is "accepting" him?  As what? I believe the 
responses by Felix and Shane were right on target. I don't intend to pursue 
this silliness any further.