[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Cell Phones -- Perception
- Subject: [at-l] Cell Phones -- Perception
- From: jbullar1 at twcny.rr.com (Jim Bullard)
- Date: Fri Jan 21 21:37:11 2005
- In-reply-to: <41F1AB1B.50406@comcast.net>
- References: <mailman.506.1106343195.511.at-l@backcountry.net> <mailman.506.1106343195.511.at-l@backcountry.net>
At 08:23 PM 1/21/2005 -0500, Steve Landis wrote:
>On 1/21/2005 4:17 PM, RoksnRoots@aol.com wrote:
>
>>In a message dated 1/21/2005 4:12:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>>jbullar1@twcny.rr.com writes:
>
>>On that, he and I agree.
>>
>>Maybe he has just had a reality check.
>
>> Leave it to the internet "Trail Community" to suddenly accept
>> WIngfoot when the opportunity to lessen wilderness ethics arises. I
>> think that's the point. I can't help but see the internet community as
>> determined to kill AT wildness (and those who support it) as an accepted
>> cause. That's just the opposite of what the AT was formed for...
>
>Wow I think he's got you now Jim. Let's see you get out of that one.
>Things must slow over at whiteblaze.net
Agreeing with WF that cell phones are a courtesy issue rather than a
destruction of wilderness issue is "accepting" him? As what? I believe the
responses by Felix and Shane were right on target. I don't intend to pursue
this silliness any further.