[at-l] New Hydrogen Process (OT)

[jbullar1 at twcny.rr.com (Jim Bullard)]

So make up something. I don't mind being evasive with people who are trying 
to get information which I think they may use to abuse me in some way. Most 
of the newspaper sites don't ask for personal identifying information 
anyway. It is usually just demographic stuff that could apply to many 
people. They want to be able to show their advertisers what their market is 
so they can get them to continue to pay for the stuff you are getting 
"free". Think of it as the price of your "free" information.

BTW here is a URL for an interesting nuclear energy article 
<http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.09/china.html> that you won't have 
to sign up to read. Apparently nuclear can be safe using technology that 
the US chose to overlook in our rush to big solutions. I no longer count a 
nuclear engineer among my frequent personal contacts but it appears to be 
feasible to my non-expert eye and, although he wasn't a fan of nuclear 
energy, E.F. Schumacher might have approved the "small" scale of this 
approach.

At 08:24 PM 11/28/2004 -0500, Shelly Hale wrote:
>Darn...hate to have to sign up for stuff...sheesh.  I really wanted to take
>a gander at that one.
>
>Shelly Hale
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Steve Landis" <s.landis@comcast.net>
>To: "AT-L" <at-l@backcountry.net>
>Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 7:49 PM
>Subject: Re: [at-l] New Hydrogen Process (OT)
>
>
> > On 11/28/2004 7:22 PM, RoksnRoots@aol.com wrote:
> > >
> > >         I read in the NY Times today that they have invented a new
>method of
> > > splitting hydrogen from oxygen in water.
> >
> > Primary source at...
> >
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/28/politics/28hydrogen.html?oref=login&th