[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Sleeping bags
With reasonable care, one can keep down dry. In 25 years, mine has never been seriously wet. I keep it in a stuff sack and the stuff sack in a plastic garbage bag. JUst sleeping in a down bag drives out most of the moisture from a damp bag. Occasionally, I would run it through a dryer in town.
Weary
> ------------Original Message------------
> From: David A Jones <dajones@isp.com>
> To: "AT-List" <at-l@mailman.backcountry.net>
> Date: Mon, Oct-25-2004 9:16 PM
> Subject: [at-l] Sleeping bags
>
> People who know the most about hiking, and sleeping bags in particular,
>
> seem to talk about choosing a sleeping bag like it's a matter of
> choosing which down bag to get. I also hear a lot of talk about not
> getting down wet. I may be completely ignorant, but it seems pretty
> wet
> out there to me. Are there just a lot of people confident that they
> will not get their down bags wet? Or does down actually respond as
> well to dampness as any other material? (Actually, I think geese do
> get
> wet.) I don't hear anybody saying "down kills". Nobody is talking
> about down like some talk about cotton? I would think the best bag be
> the one that is still warm when wet, or the one that will dry most
> quickly, or at least one that won't self destruct if it gets wet? I'd
> use this sort of logic to choose a wool sweater over a cotton sweat
> shirt. How does wet logic apply to sleeping bags? Easy cleaning of a
>
> synthetic bag would be a second consideration to me, but still a
> valuable one. I just don't get it. So down is light. How much more
> weight are you really lugging when you choose synthetic? A pound?
> Isn't that extra weight kind of like wet insurance? Never mind the
> cruelty thing.
>
> _______________________________________________
> at-l mailing list
> at-l@backcountry.net
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
>
>