[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] OT - Cell tower in Yellowstone?
- Subject: [at-l] OT - Cell tower in Yellowstone?
- From: jbullar1 at twcny.rr.com (Jim Bullard)
- Date: Wed Mar 17 21:40:56 2004
- In-reply-to: <1e8.1b9ae4ca.2d8a6082@aol.com>
At 09:16 PM 3/17/2004 -0500, RoksnRoots@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 3/17/04 12:38:45 PM, pmags@yahoo.com writes:
>
>
> > CHEYENNE, Wyo. -- An environmental group says a
> > 100-foot cell-phone tower overlooking Old Faithful in
> > Yellowstone National Park is an unnecessary eyesore
> > and might signal the beginning of "the death of
> > solitude" in America's national parks.
> >
>
> *** There you go. Thanks mags...
>
> The park said "it was a matter of safety." Bull's-eye.
> Hey
>isn't NPS also overseeing the AT? Gee, I wonder how they feel about it over
>there?
It took some looking to find a photo. Most of the sites carrying the story
don't have any pictures but there is a picture with this one
<http://www.cellular-news.com/story/10834.shtml>. It's pretty obvious. I
wonder why they felt it necessary to more than double the planned height.
When the Congress passed the bill that enabled the building of cell towers
they gave cell tower companies powers akin to eminent domain in locating
them. I know there have been some skirmishes in the Adirondacks over
whether the "Forever Wild" clause has more authority or whether the tower
companies mandate is greater. So far it isn't a big problem because the
customer base is too small for wide coverage of the 'Dacks to be cost
effective. That's probably not true in National Parks and one more reason
we don't want a National Park in the Adirondacks.