[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] A suggestion that Ryan create the OT-L
- Subject: [at-l] A suggestion that Ryan create the OT-L
- From: stephensadams at hotmail.com (Steve Adams)
- Date: Fri Feb 27 13:00:53 2004
OrangeBug,
Reference your post, dated 2-26-04, advising, ?My suggstion was that OT-L
would be a refuge for hikers, and let the highly knowledgeable AT-L ?heavy
users? continue to use AT-L for their very important topics, just not
particularly hiking related.?
I thought the prefix ?OT? was to meet the needs of those of us who, from
time to time, drift Off Topic to discuss non-hiking-related subjects. If
this is the case, we already have the distinction you seek, through using
OT-L and AT-L. Does not the OT prefix on a post subject heading already
alert users seeking a hiking related discussion to ignore that particular
post and read another, non-OT, post?
I was about to suggest we use the prefix POL instead of OT if the discussion
was both Off Topic and Political. (I capitalize freely.)
Steve
_________________________________________________________________
Get fast, reliable access with MSN 9 Dial-up. Click here for Special Offer!
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/