[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Are hostels/motels really a necessity?
- Subject: [at-l] Are hostels/motels really a necessity?
- From: kellyswhitman at hotmail.com (Kelly Whitman)
- Date: Wed Oct 15 23:38:23 2003
It looks like I just might be able to scrape the funds together for a
(budget) 2004 thruhike. I'm still not sure about some things but all of a
sudden this is all so much more REAL!! Eek! lol
I'm looking at my budget and trying to cut down on the amount of time spent
in towns, since time in towns = money gone, and I got to wondering... has
anyone completed a thruhike without staying in ANY hostels or motels along
the way, purely living on the trail? Is that desireable or even possible,
and what are the pros and cons? I lived in my car for 2 years (to finish
college). I know that's not a thruhike, I just mean that I can and have
gone for long periods of time without sleeping in a bed in a room when
necessary. Since I have allergies, finding a hostel or motel that doesn't
want to kill me can be a real challenge, anyway. I'm allergic to mice, so I
won't be staying in the shelters along the trail, either, just my hammock.
Anyone feel like they absolutely had to stay indoors at some point along the
trail, and what was the reason? Rain? Rest? How do people spend their
zero days when camped along the trail? Will they be tediously boring if I
spend mine there instead of in front of a tv in a motel room?
Kelly Whitman
INTP
-----------
"There ARE no other women like me." -- 7 of 9
_________________________________________________________________
Never get a busy signal because you are always connected with high-speed
Internet access. Click here to comparison-shop providers.
https://broadband.msn.com