[at-l] put a cork in it

[jbryankramer at msn.com (J Bryan Kramer)]

If you are talking about the Saddleback link you'll notice I captioned it
with, IIRC, "and other general chest beating" which should indicate that I
don't accept anything at face value that these groups are posting. They all
have axes to grind on both sides of these issues.

The point I was making that there are a large number of these links, I don't
have the time or inclination to track down the facts of each of the
complaints. But the wide geographical range and sheer number must indicate
that there is a big problem.

And for those who still claim that condemnation is not used, well look at
this Vermont case appeal court document:

https://www.tourolaw.edu/2ndCircuit/Pre95/92-6201.html

Bryan

"Si vis pacem para bellum"

>
> >"...All designed to "discredit" Bryan - but Weary offers no
> explanation, no
> >rationalization - no evidence that the organization is anything
> of the sort.
> >Only a bald, unsupported statement." complains Jim.
>
> Sorry you feel that way. But I pointed out two obvious errors. I
> suspect that is
> enough for most of the list.  I've been getting their mailings
> for a decade.
> They suddenly changed their name to one that pretends to
> objectivity. But those
> of us who have had to deal with the group over the decades
> recognize the same
> old distortions. I truly doubt if anyone wants to hear the
> details. But I could
> be persuaded to supply them if I sense anyone besides Jim and
> Bryan wants to
> hear them.
>
> Weary
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> at-l mailing list
> at-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
>