[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] OT security - was Cost of a thru-hike?
- Subject: [at-l] OT security - was Cost of a thru-hike?
- From: jbullar1 at twcny.rr.com (Jim Bullard)
- Date: Wed Jul 16 07:36:41 2003
- References: <1c9.cac1861.2c45eff8@aol.com>
Yeah right! Maybe that's why the terrorists flew commercial jets (with a business reason for flying) into the WTC instead of walking through the door with bombs a backpack. "Check those grungy thru-hikers carrying all their belongings on their backs men but don't worry about the trucks. If a terrorist does get through in a commercial truck and blows the place up we'll be able to trace who did it." What's that old adage about closing the barn door?
----- Original Message -----
From: RoksnRoots@aol.com
To: wdlists@optonline.net
Cc: AT-L@Backcountry.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: Re: [at-l] Cost of a thru-hike?
In a message dated 7/15/2003 5:31:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time, wdlists@optonline.net writes:
However when the security alert is set to Orange you may be subject to
search of your backpack. Only backpackers and box trucks are subject - no
cars - no semi's - no gasoline/propane trucks. If anyone figures out what
security mentality justifies this policy, please let me know.
A propane truck belongs to a company with a traceable address and business reason for crossing.
A backpack arrives untraced, unregistered, untagged, unplated, unlicensed - and with just enough space for a brief case nuclear device that would leave a sparkling hole in the space that used to contain the bridge...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.hack.net/pipermail/at-l/attachments/20030716/1ed18a1d/attachment.htm