[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] The Kennebec Ferry Contract
- Subject: [at-l] The Kennebec Ferry Contract
- From: RoksnRoots at aol.com (RoksnRoots@xxxxxxx)
- Date: Mon Jun 16 13:19:19 2003
Jim wrote:
" They really
wanted to give it to the local people but because of certification and
insurance problems, and in view of the creeping litiginousness that we all
live with, the decision had to be in favor of NEOC. "
*** Which is exactly what I suspected. The lesson being that NPS
strength and backing comes at the cost of importing larger national park concerns
and methods into the Trail.
I don't think it's appropriate to use an MATC issue as an excuse to
go after Weary or try to diminish his reputation. It's obvious this is being
overblown by certain members in order to get back for AT philosophy beliefs
Weary may have expressed. With land acquisitions costing up to 4 million, the 6
thousand spent on the ferry contract is relative peanuts in the scope of things.
I can imagine what would have happened if a "Rat Pack" got to the row
boats left at the Kennebec on a good day... ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.hack.net/pipermail/at-l/attachments/20030616/9cc504a5/attachment.htm