[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Rests: Foam, Z, Ridge?
- Subject: [at-l] Rests: Foam, Z, Ridge?
- From: Phil.Heffington@xxxxxx (Phil Heffington)
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:38:24 -0600
I concur with the dilemma of trying to roll or fold a closed cell pad into =
a size that is manageable. However, you are not solving much by going to a=
Z-rest over a Ridgerest, for example.
I prefer the Ridgerest if I am not going to use the 3/4 inch, Long, Ultrali=
te Thermarest inflatable mattress alone. The Thermarest mentioned weighs a=
pprox. 2 lbs., while the Ridgerest weighs about 1 lb. My real preference n=
ow is to combine the Ridgerest with a 3/4 length Lite Thermarest (don't con=
fuse the 3/4 inch with the 3/4 length). The combo weighs a total of approx=
. 2 lbs., but gives you a throw down cushion for the trail and two cushions=
to sleep on, with the Ridgerest under your body alone from about the knees=
on down.
The Thermarests are small, and can be rolled up to a size which is only sli=
ghtly larger than a large mayonaise jar. The Ridgerest is large, but I sol=
ve the rain cover problem by simply folding it into thirds and putting it u=
nder the rain cover. It is not too hard to work with, and it is practicall=
y indestructable, and not too expensive, at about $20.
If you should go to the inflatable Thermarests you must take a repair kit w=
ith you for small punctures. I've only had a puncture in one of them in ab=
out 1600 miles of hiking, but it is virtually worthless if you get a leak t=
hat you can't repair. The repair kit does work well, however.