[at-l] Forums (last call)

[ryan@hack.net (Ryan K. Brooks)]

Good point.   The rationale behind the forums was exactly that-   if I
we're to create the AT-L today it would probably be a forums based
interface (even though I'm relatively "old school").

So I suppose a third option is to actually kill the lists and keep the
forums.

R

t. wrote:

>1st of all, I'd NEVER suppose to tell anyone how to spend THEIR money.
>
>I seldom use them, too.   But, just today, we got an email from it.  (the
>couple wanting info on hiking Maine).  I'd be curious if forums attract
>people to the *real* list?  it's an easier way to browse and see if you want
>to join.
>
> I suspect having redundant methods to use the list is just that redundant.
>I've seen several lists work with a forum.  but, they didn't have the email
>option.
>
>If I had to choose between the forum, and, the email option we have all
>grown use to, I'd choose the email.
>
>t.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Billie H. Cleek" <cleek@cleekhouse.com>
>To: "Ryan K. Brooks" <ryan@hack.net>
>Cc: <at-l@backcountry.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:36 AM
>Subject: Re: [at-l] Forums (last call)
>
>
>
>
>>Ryan,
>>
>>In the interest of getting others to respond, I'm sending you my
>>response publicly:
>>
>>
>
>
>