[at-l] Staying on Topic - LONG

[TrailR@aol.com (TrailR@aol.com)]

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
In a message dated 9/23/2002 9:38:53 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
chaynes@megalink.net writes:


>
> I didn't call anyone a bully, just pointed out the fact that the click "is"
> a bullyish and controling bunch. Now the Clique that you discribe may not
> be
> narrow or exclusive in your opinion, but if you look at list numbers it is
> very narrow and exclusive.
> Frankly given the clicks anti WF obsession, it seems strange that the list
> click is so much like him, in that, like WF only the list "click's" view is
> valid and acceptable. I guess one could say the AT-L Click (or clique as
> you
> prefer to call it) is just a group of Dans of a different color. (Hmm maybe
> reason WF and the Click don't get along is because they are so much alike
> in
> there need to control?)
>
> With regard to the hint. no thanks. I don't need friends badly enough to
> resort to bullying folks to comply with the "Click's" party line.
>
> _______________________________________________


You are wasting more bandwidth than the people you whine about...
Do you get your Jollies just instigating arguments?
Get over it. Get a life.
Not all of us are anti WF people, but I'm starting to be anti you...
I don't think you need to worry about having friends... Seems unlikely.

Russ