[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: [at-l] RE: Re: [at-l] RE: Why the Grand Unification Theory - isn't

Subject: Re[2]: [at-l] RE: Re: [at-l] RE: Why the Grand Unification Theory - isn't
From: Bob C." <ellen@clinic.net (Bob C.)
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 22:00:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <adp31f$v28$1@edina.hack.net>
References: <mailman.1023410242.29349.at-l@mailman.backcountry.net><adp31f$v28$1@edina.hack.net>

"...Someone tell me what the h... this has to do with AT hiking" asks rusty.

 Well,  bounce  back a few scores of posts and you'll see the connection. At the
 moment, we are just humans exploring a fascinating concept that grew out of the
 trail,  but  also, beyond the trail. Don't stop us quite yet. We are getting to
 the end.

 Weary

References:
- [at-l] RE: Re: [at-l] RE: Why the Grand Unification Theory - isn't
  - From: revmrf@kingcon.com (revmrf)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Shelter Courtesy - Some Specifics May Help
Next by Date: [at-l] Shelter Courtesy - Some Specifics May Help
Prev by thread: [at-l] RE: Re: [at-l] RE: Why the Grand Unification Theory - isn't
Next by thread: [at-l] More Magaroni, anyone? :O)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread