[at-l] What McKaye Really Wanted

[icw39@ncfreedom.net (Clark Wright)]

"The answer, my friend(s) is blowin' in the wind . . . the answer is
blowin' in the wind!" . . . 

RoksnRoots@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 4/12/2002 3:56:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> sloetoe@yahoo.com writes:
> 
> > Top 2 Reasons cited as killing off interest in the AT advocacy
> > on the at-l?
> > 1) Rocks
> > 2) Roots
> >
> 
>      ***   Brilliant Sloetoe. TJ writes a childish taunt about the correct
> interpretation of MacKaye's writings supporting condo development and
> clearing of the AT corridor and you back him up. This pretty much sums up the
> problem...
> 
>     Is scapegoating people who stand up for the Trail a way of avoiding the
> question?
> 
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> >From the AT-L mailing list         est. 1995
> Need help?  http://www.at-l.org
> Archives: http://www.backcountry.net/arch/at/
> Change your options or unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l