[at-l] A Question Of Trail and other inanities

[texas12step@hotmail.com (Texas Twelve-Step)]

> "...The original (as I wrote it - not as you re-wrote it) 
> read - The guy is an ignoramus, but his ignorance is no 
> dumber than the idea that ALL private land should be 
> subject to public taking at the whim of the government (in
> particular for the creation of "wilderness") particularly
> (as RnR seems to believe it should be) without compensation
> or justification." reports Jim in claiming I misquoted him
> when left out parenthetical material.

> Well, I'll admit that Jim tries to put too much into a
> single sentence that makes it confusing, but let's try 
> to break it down. First he claims RnR is an ignoramus. 

<smite>

No, he didn't.

-TXIIS