[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: [at-l] A Question Of Trail

Subject: Re[2]: [at-l] A Question Of Trail
From: Bob C." <ellen@clinic.net (Bob C.)
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 08:38:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <147.c550d61.29de94de@aol.com>
References: <147.c550d61.29de94de@aol.com>

"...I musta missed that one. Is there something before, during (like the ...) or
after that would make it make sense?"

 Not that I know of.  "...ALL private land should be subject to
> public  taking  at  the  whim  of  the  government  ...without compensation or
> justification." is what Jim O. claims some of us believe.

I've  never  seen any evidence that anyone believes that. But I suppose someone,
someplace may do so.

Weary

References:
- [at-l] A Question Of Trail
  - From: DaRedhead@aol.com (DaRedhead@aol.com)

Prev by Date: [at-l] 2002 Thru-Hikers Handbook
Next by Date: [at-l] Zen Joke
Prev by thread: [at-l] A Question Of Trail
Next by thread: [at-l] A Question Of Trail
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread