[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: [at-l] topic police... I'll say it ---- havingbeen.....

Subject: Re[2]: [at-l] topic police... I'll say it ---- havingbeen.....
From: kahley@ptd.net (kahley)
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 14:42:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: <18222241343.20020404134052@clinic.net>
References: <4.2.0.58.20020404124122.00a84100@mail.ptdprolog.net><3CAC7B01.28BC086E@montana.com><4.2.0.58.20020404124122.00a84100@mail.ptdprolog.net>

At 01:40 PM 4/4/02 -0500, Bob C. wrote:
>"...the  angst  I  referred  to  was among those who resented the 
>increased gear
>content and repeatedly posted their views on same." says Kahley.
>
>I  must not have been paying attention. I don't recall complaints about 
>too many
>gear  posts.

This happened years ago.  I don't think you were here then.


>Weary
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
> From the AT-L mailing list         est. 1995
>Need help?  http://www.at-l.org
>Archives: http://www.backcountry.net/arch/at/
>Change your options or unsubscribe:
>http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l

References:
- [at-l] topic police... I'll say it ---- having been.....
  - From: kahley@ptd.net (kahley)
- OK, I'll say it: Re: [at-l] Now ---- having been.....
  - From: yumitori@montana.com (Ron Martino)
- Re[2]: [at-l] topic police... I'll say it ---- having been.....
  - From: Bob C." <ellen@clinic.net (Bob C.)

Prev by Date: [at-l] A Question Of Trail
Next by Date: [at-l] topic police... I'll say it ---- having been.....
Prev by thread: Re[2]: [at-l] topic police... I'll say it ---- having been.....
Next by thread: [at-l] topic police... I'll say it ---- having been.....
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread