[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] has the AT become too easy??

Subject: [at-l] has the AT become too easy??
From: kahley@ptd.net (kahley)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:56:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <00c901c1d1f3$1a17a5a0$fc0b010a@atc.skytel.com>
References: <F123bRwIzsVrtXbYkXa0001a624@hotmail.com>

At 04:44 PM 3/22/02 -0600, t. wrote:
>So.  Since this is no longer a "thruhiking advice" list,
>
>thru-hiker-want-a-be's  ;-)    want to know.
>
>t.

Teej...it never was a thruhiking advice list.
There's many Thruhikers on the list....  As to why the thruhikers
here don't answer questions as often as some would like, think about
it.  Maybe the one thing they know that the rest of us don't is advice
doesn't travel well .........
Of course, what do I know <VVBG>

References:
- Fwd: [at-l] has the AT become too easy??
  - From: spiriteagle99@hotmail.com (Jim and/or Ginny Owen)
- [at-l] has the AT become too easy??
  - From: t." <tjfort@netdoor.com (t.)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Putnam Icebergs
Next by Date: [at-l] WF and the ATML
Prev by thread: [at-l] has the AT become too easy??
Next by thread: [at-l] has the AT become too easy??
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread