[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Baxter Ban

Subject: [at-l] Baxter Ban
From: thornel@attglobal.net (W F Thorneloe)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:46:45 -0500
In-Reply-To: <30.2411d7ae.29cc996a@aol.com>

Clyde, how dare you fail to mention ANWR!

;-)

OrangeBug
<at least I know where to get ice for my tea>

At 09:27 AM 3/22/2002 -0500, Rcli3@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 3/21/2002 9:57:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>RoksnRoots@aol.com writes:
>
>
> > This is the same poster who said Wingfoot had nothing to do with
> > Putnam Mine.
>
>What the hell does Putnam mine have to do with Baxter.  You are doing it
>again.  Throwing it up where it makes no sense. Give it a rest already.

References:
- [at-l] Baxter Ban
  - From: Rcli3@aol.com (Rcli3@aol.com)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Re: Cleanliness
Next by Date: [at-l] WF and AT-L History Long Delete at will
Prev by thread: [at-l] Baxter Ban
Next by thread: [at-l] Baxter Ban
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread