Fw: [at-l] Deeper subjects - the Trail and Sept 11

[freighttrain7@home.com (Abe)]

that page clearly states:    copyd and pasted:

Most authoritative sources are telling us that there is no serious threat
from current inspection and treatment devices to photographic prints and
negatives. The possible danger lies in damage to film - either fresh film,
or film that has been exposed and is being sent to a lab for processing.

That means the most likely problem areas for photographers would be in
sending exposed film to a lab, or in getting shipments of fresh film from a
supplier.



but in another paragraph it states it should be safe to send to a lab?
who knows !         but for a few dollars, my film will not be damaged :)

freighttrain


----- Original Message -----
From: <saunterer@jimbullard.org>
To: "at-l@.backcountry." <at-l@backcountry.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [at-l] Deeper subjects - the Trail and Sept 11


> At 04:18 PM 1/15/02 -0500, Abe wrote:
> > > One effect of Sept11 will be that everyone will have to come up with a
new
> > > plan for mailing home rolls of film
>
> Not necessarily.  This article on the site of the NY Institute of
> Photography re: mailing film for processing post 9/11 is interesting.
> http://www.nyip.com/tips/tip_break_news1201.php
>
> sAunTerer
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT-L mailing list
> AT-L@mailman.backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l