[at-l] "The Trail Isn't Really Wilderness Anyway..."

[cleek@cleekhouse.com (Billie H. Cleek)]

Ok, Roks, just out of curiosity, are you ever in favor of windpower, and
if so when?
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:21:34PM -0500, RoksnRoots@aol.com claimed:
> He said officials wanted to steer clear of undeveloped heights where a 
> windmill would be out of place. 
> ???I wouldn???t put one on top of Camel???s Hump, but I would put one where there 
> is an infrastructure already set up. In my view, ski areas are exactly the 
> place to have a windmill,??? Dean said. 
>     
> 
>     ***  This is the downward slide providing the means to further develop 
> incompatible infrastructure into the corridor which inevitably occurs when 
> just a little more is OK because - "there's an infrastructure already set-up" 
> in there - or "the Trail really isn't a wilderness anyway..."
> 
>      This is part of the reason why it's important to understand MacKaye. 
> First it's a ski-area to serve local needs, then it's ridgetop power 
> development... 
> 
> 
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> AT-L mailing list
> AT-L@mailman.backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l

-- 
The opposite of paranoia: The absurd belief that one is NOT being persecuted.