[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] at-l] So is 53 pounds "Lightweight"???
- Subject: [at-l] at-l] So is 53 pounds "Lightweight"???
- From: janl2@mindspring.com (Jan Leitschuh)
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 22:38:31 -0500
> underfooded
Wow! Another new word! Is this an inventive list, or what?
And this could also almost be a Word of the Day, except, of course, it
couldn't be...
Sloetoe wrote:
> But I'm carrying
> almost as much food weight for myself for 195 miles in cold
> weather as I did for me and the SmallBoys(c) doing 100 miles in
> warmer weather..... Ohhhh, I guess it makes sense, but I've not
> done a bottom up menu before,
Awaiting the conclusion...
and I need the reassurance of a
> second go-round before I give my pack to Greyhound for them to
> lose. I'll be in touch.
...And the trip report.
>
--
========================================
Jan Leitschuh Sporthorses Ltd.
http://www.mindspring.com/~janl2
E-mail: mailto:janl2@mindspring.com
========================================