[at-l] RE: Glucosamine

[lparker@cacaphony.net (L. Parker)]

Marty,

I did not retain the search after I finished with it, so I ran a new one for
you. I'm also bouncing a copy to the list in case anyone else is interested.
These are the sites I consider relevant, i.e. they don't appear to be
selling the product...

http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/DSH/glucosamine.html

http://webmd.lycos.com/content/article/3187.13451

http://webmd.lycos.com/content/article/1680.50484

http://www.rheumatology.org/patients/hotline/970127.html

http://webmd.lycos.com/content/article/3187.13588

And here is the one on quality control:

http://my.webmd.com/content/article/1728.56163


> From: Martin Fors [mailto:revmrf@kingcon.com]

> Hi Lee,
>
> As I have been on glucosamine since January 2000, and have
> found it quite
> effectively good for me, would you pass along to me the
> resources [web page
> links if you have them] of the study you mentioned?  marty