[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pct-l] Re: horses on pct / blisterfree
- Subject: Re: [pct-l] Re: horses on pct / blisterfree
- From: NoHorses%40aol%2Ecom
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 23:52:37 -0400 (EDT)
In a message dated 97-10-13 17:15:46 EDT, you write:
<< also, trails are constructed and maintained with horse traffic in mind.
although i can ride, i have always been a backpacker. now as a maintainer
for a foot/horse path, i can truly appreciate the differences in
construction technique and considerations. a trail properly constructed
for horses can withstand the punishment better than one constructed solely
for foot traffic (pun not intended, but credit gladly accepted). >>
Perhaps you can appreciate this, then, coming from a maintainer/builder/
user of trails..
If it were not for the horses being on the trail, the trails would be
easier and cheaper to maintain. Allow me to explain:
If a trail is built to stock standards, it must be reinforced, and will
thus be more costly. If it were built to hiking standards, it could be less
wide, less clear of brush, and would( in most areas) not have to be
Of course, this would put a lot of trail crews out of work. But I'm willing
to sacrifice that part of volunteering or working to cut the need for
unnecessary spending by the government..
* From the Pacific Crest Trail Email List | For info http://www.hack.net/lists *