[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] Gear Test Notifications - Tabulations to date
- Subject: [pct-l] Gear Test Notifications - Tabulations to date
- From: randy_forsland at hotmail.com (Randy Forsland)
- Date: Wed Dec 31 21:47:38 2003
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org><004501c3d015$4fb10e00$6401a8c0@BOB>
Apathy reigns supreme...that should speak volumes about the importance of
the subject at hand...
Now try getting a survey concerning posting pics from nude hiking day and
you may get somewhere..
now back to my flock
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Bankhead" <email@example.com>
To: "Andrew Priest" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "PCT List Forum" <email@example.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [pct-l] Gear Test Notifications - Tabulations to date
> It is no surprise that you would have emails that never got copied to the
> list. The list sends its messages to each subscriber's email. From there,
> they chose REPLY, their message goes only to the person who posted and
> subscribers never see it. If they choose REPLY ALL, then a copy goes to
> list as well as to the poster.
> That said, one can only analyze the data one has, and the only source
> available to the public is the list archives. Hence, that is the data I
> and, as I said, 11 responses out of a subscriber population of several
> hundred is a poor sample. It is however the only sample available. My
> comments about the unresponsive sheep still remains valid.
> Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the reviews and the discussions on the BPGT
> group and website. I just don't think they belong here.
> Best wishes,
> Bob Bankhead
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Priest" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: "PCT List Forum" <email@example.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 6:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [pct-l] Gear Test Notifications - Tabulations to date
> > At 09:41 AM 01/01/2004, Bob Bankhead wrote:
> > >Mr. Priest seems to think that opinon favors his postings.
> > >They do not.
> > Hi Bob
> > Actually, as I have got quite a bit of email direct and not through the
> > list (the list does not appear to be set to automatically reply to the
> > list, at least not for me), your claim is not quite as accurate as you
> > suggest. I would suggest care is always needed in claiming "facts" when
> > don't have all the information. Also please note when I made that
> > statement! Using emails post that point in time to discredit the
> > is not, IMO, a very constructive approach to the debate. Had a made that
> > statement now, I would be more inclined to accept your premise, except
> > the private emails.
> > That said I will not be posting the announcement here. While the
> > is balanced in terms of emails I have received and I have ok from Ryan
> > understand it, I have no intention of antangonising folks, hence why I
> > asked in the first place.
> > Thanks for your feedback.
> > Regards
> > Andrew Priest
> pct-l mailing list
> unsubscribe or change options: