[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: [pct-l] regulations...
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 15:33:23 +0100
I've been itching to say something about the discussion you have been
having on US government. But I haven't as it seems dangerous to get
in between two or more people enjoying their ranting and raving. My
experience as a European in hiking in the US has been:
- that there are incredibly beautiful trails that are actually maintained
- that people have a notion that there is such a thing as 'leave no
- that the idea of regulating the use of the land makes hiking more enjoyable
- that regulations guarantee campsites that give you an idea of
loneliness and wilderness
Paying for a wilderness permit has been annoying, but not as much as
having to deal with overcrowded campsites, snack papers and toilet
paper everywhere, trails that are rutted to ten feet wide 'highways',
nobody knowing that there actually IS a trail (no park rangers over
here...). All this coming from the other side of the Atlantic,
Europe. Of course I live in about the most crowded place in the world
with the least mountainous area: the Netherlands. This might colour
my idea of the benefits of government intervention.
Just my two cents, don't bite the head of the innocent low-lander here!
* From the PCT-L | Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html *