Re[2]: [at-l] Vote please

[tmcginnis@ucclan.state.in.us (Thomas McGinnis)]

     Honestly not. I just liked both choices, and voted my approval of 
     both. Accidental obtusity. (I DARE you to say that three times fast.)
     But I do like both choices: targeted, specific, simple, and 
     attractive. Could be my next choice in mate has those characteristics. 
     Helluva thought.
     
     Sloetoe
     (Seven days)
     
     Now playing: "I'm not Running Anymore" from Felix's Boss.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: [at-l] Vote please
Author:  kahley7 <kahley7@ptd.net> at ima
Date:    9/1/99 11:43 AM


aw come on Tommy....you know what happens to folks that straddle the fence.... 
or is this obtusity supposed to reflect something my simple mind can't 
grasp <g>
     
At 09:23 AM 9/1/99 -0500, you wrote: 
>      My vote: Yes.
>
>
>The options:
>
>A   Give it to the ATC Land Trust Fund to acquire viewsheds 
>         http://www.atconf.org/protection.html#anchor71336
>B   Pick 2 0r 3 Trail Maintainence Organizations out of a hat and split it 
>between them
>         to use to buy tools and such. 
>
>Okay gang.....help!!!!!
>
>
>
>
>
     
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List |  http://www.backcountry.net  *
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List |  http://www.backcountry.net  *

==============================================================================