[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [at-l] PUR Hiker vs. Polar Pure
- Subject: Re: [at-l] PUR Hiker vs. Polar Pure
- From: " bluestreak" <bluestreak@mailcity.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 17:03:45 -0700
- Organization: MailCity (http://www.mailcity.lycos.com:80)
The info with the Polar Pure states that it will not kill Giardia at water temps less than 60 degrees. I assume that this applies regardless of the time you wait to drink. I also carry it just as a back up to my filter.
---
the bluestreak
New Hampshire
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 09:27:02 Phil Heffington wrote:
>I've been considering lightening my load by only taking the Polar Pure
>iodine purification system on my section hike of the AT next year. It
>occurred to me over the weekend that it might, in fact, not be a good weight
>trade off. My PUR Hiker weighs 15 oz.and my Polar Pure bottle filled weighs
>5 oz. Sounds like a no brainer in saving 10 oz., but is it really? If I
>carry the PUR Hiker and fill my bottle(s) and drink them on the spot,
>wouldn't it be better than carrying the weight of the water for the period
>of time it takes for the iodine to work? At 2 lbs. per quart the weight of
>the water gets pretty heavy if it is just for the purpose of waiting until
>the iodine works. Also, how cold is the spring water on the trail? How
>will this affect the time it takes for the iodine to work in it?
>* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | http://www.backcountry.net *
>
Get your FREE Email at http://mailcity.lycos.com
Get your PERSONALIZED START PAGE at http://my.lycos.com
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | http://www.backcountry.net *
==============================================================================