[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [at-l] doubble barreled logic and rhetoric?
- Subject: Re: [at-l] doubble barreled logic and rhetoric?
- From: kahley7 <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:21:20 -0700
> > It would've been *glorious.*
>To where or what, exactly, can "it" point or refer? I can grant you here a
>*glorious* ambiguity: depression? you? being? we? me? knowledge? opinion?
>logic? rhetoric? AT-L? ethics? government? justice? eminent domain? the
>email (not) sent? the exchange of emails (not) sent? ....
Why the exchange of emails of course! But in respect of Wild Bill's
can we clearly label them Bucky v David (listed alphabetically) so that those
uninterested may delete? And if you two choose to take it off list, please
list me for a CC. Although I tend to wallow in rhetoric and only come up
er....I mean logic, when absolutely necessary.........
Tommy, you wanna play too? ;^)
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | http://www.backcountry.net *