[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [at-l] Kelty Gale backpack



I have the Kelty Brisbane. It's an internal that expands to 3,000ci. It 
weighs around 2.5. Works great for me for ultralight hiking.

Give Me Chocolate

Phil Heffington wrote:
> 
> I've been surfing the net for a few minutes and ran across the Kelty
> website.  I scanned across their listing of backpacks in an effort to
> identify backpacks which would do the job, but be a savings in weight.  I
> saw the Kelty "Gale" listed as a pack which weighs 2 lbs. 10oz. and has a
> capacity of 3500 c.i.   It is listed as costing $90.  Is there something
> wrong or unmentioned about this pack?  It seems remarkably light for the
> capacity listed.  Most of Kelty's other packs are in the 5-6 lb. range.
> 
> Tell me what you know about this.  I'm  looking for a way to lighten my pack
> weight down from my Kelty Tioga, which weighs in at 5 lbs. 11oz. if the pack
> cover is included (according to my spring loaded scales).
> * From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List |  http://www.backcountry.net  *
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List |  http://www.backcountry.net  *

==============================================================================