[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Oops! Re[3]: [at-l] Wow! My original intro and ADA
Thank you.
BTW, I have not said that all ATML or AT-L'ers are ignorant about ADA or
bigoted. I did say that some of our responses to Max were less that
charitable or appropriate, regardless of our opinions about the ADA or the
dadburn Federal Gummint.
I have only suggested we give the guy a chance, which is all we can do.
Even those of us who thru-hike have 90% chance of going home early. If any
of us did this sport out of common sense, the trail would be empty. We do
it for a dream and many other non-rational reasons.
OrangeBug
Atlanta, GA
At 10:20 AM 5/10/1999 -0500, Thomas McGinnis wrote:
> I would like to apologize to OrangeBug for mis-addressing what was
> supposed to be my private reply to him -- obviously I didn't clean out
> the addressing-to-all before I hit "send". What was supposed to be a
> minor "rebuke" to lighten up and to see the similar VALIDITY of the
> other side of the issue...ended up as a public doink I did not intend
> -- and did not intend because I didn't want to feed this thread. Or
> rather feed the sniping tone starting to inject itself into this
> thread. And speaking of injections, I also put in what was supposed to
> be a private doink at the ATML, and by making it public, I also
> contributed to the thought on the ATML that the AT-L has some sort of
> institutional bias against it. That is unfortunate, too, and I
> apologize for that, as well, to both the AT-L and to the ATML, for
> those who "are members" of both.
>
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | http://www.backcountry.net *
==============================================================================