RE: [at-l] Southbound Anyone?

["Walt Daniels" <wdaniels@bestweb.net>]

Right and the northbounds just stop at the top and stay there ther rest of
their lives.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-at-l@backcountry.net [mailto:owner-at-l@backcountry.net]On
> Behalf Of Jim Hipp
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 1999 10:17 PM
> To: AT-L list
> Subject: Re: [at-l] Southbound Anyone?
>
>
> > Okay, I'll bite. Why is it 5 miles longer going South than it is going
> North?
>
>
> Obviously the AT is the same length either way but the way I see it, is
> that I have to walk up the AT 5 miles  to get to the start on
> "K" and then
> walk down the same 5 miles.
>
> Jim
>
> jimhipp@worldnet.att.net
> down a country lane in AL
>
> ----------
> > From: bullard@northnet.org
> > To: at-l@backcountry.net
> > Subject: Re: [at-l] Southbound Anyone?
> > Date: Wednesday, March 24, 1999 9:01 PM
> >
> > At 07:18 PM 3/24/99 -0600, Jim Hipp wrote:
> >
> > >>>>
> >
> > <excerpt>
> >
> > <fontfamily><param>Times New Roman</param>Count me in for a southbound
> > hike this year. The only disadvantage I see is the potential
> for problems
> > with blackflies and that I will have to hike 5 miles further to finish
> > the thru-hike.
> >
> >
> > </fontfamily></excerpt>Okay, I'll bite. Why is it 5 miles longer going
> > South than it is going North?
> >
> >
> > Saunterer
> > * From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List |
http://www.backcountry.net  *
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List |  http://www.backcountry.net  *

* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List |  http://www.backcountry.net  *

==============================================================================