[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Fw: Internet Charges



----------
> From: MARY_JACOBS@udlp.com
> To: Rickey C. Schmuck <103716.2560@compuserve.com>;
KSProperties@compuserve.com; dwgohn@juno.com; kschmuck@juno.com;
ALLEN_NAIPO@udlp.com; CLIFFORD_TURNER@udlp.com; DAVE_GILLIANS@udlp.com;
bogey1@worldlynxyork.net
> Subject: Internet Charges
> Date: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 3:27 PM
> 
> >
> Here is a reply from someone at Washington, 
> D.C.  Apparently this is a hoax
> >,
> >   That was very interesting, thanks, Alas, it is not true.
> >   While it is true that there have been proposals to impose taxes on 
> internet
> >access or sales made over the internet, both at the state and federal 
> level, the
> >Congress last year passed a law banning any new internet taxes for three

> yearrs
> >while the issue is studied further. President Clinton signed the bill 
> including
> >the moratorium into law.
> >    I'm attaching the description of that part of the tax law, taken
from the 
> >report of the House Committee on Ways and Means:
> >
> >  On June 22, 1998, H.R. 4105, the ``Internet Tax Freedom Bill,'' was
> >   introduced by Representative Cox. On June 23, 1998, the bill was
called 
> >   up by the House under suspension of the rules and passed by voice
vote. 
> >   H.R. 4105 was received in the Senate and was placed on the Senate
> >   Legislative Calender under General Orders. On October 8, 1998, the
> >   Senate passed S. 442, its version of the ``Internet Tax Freedom
Act''. 
> >   H.R. 4328, the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental
> >   Appropriations Act, 1999, as enacted (P.L. 105 277), included
provisions 
> >   similar to S. 442.
> >      The ``Internet Tax Freedom Act,'' as signed into law by the
> >   President, generally imposed a three-year moratorium on taxes on
> >   Internet access and multiple or discriminatory taxes on electronic
> >   commerce. The Act created an Advisory Commission on Electronic
Commerce 
> >   to examine Federal, State and local taxes related to electronic
> >   Commerce, and it also included declarations that the Internet should
be 
> >   free of new Federal taxes and that the Internet should be free of
> >   foreign tariffs, trade barriers, and other restrictions. 
> >
>      >Received: from portal.udlp.com ([192.169.4.225]) by ccmail.udlp.com
with SMTP
>   (IMA Internet Exchange 3.11) id 00214CE9; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 12:11:59
-0600
> Received: from portal.udlp.com (root@localhost)
> 	by portal.udlp.com with ESMTP id MAA07107
> 	for <mary_jacobs@udlp.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 12:07:02 -0600 (CST)
> From: phyllisbyers@POP.paonline.com
> Received: from paonline.com (mail.paonline.com [207.44.20.2])
> 	by portal.udlp.com with SMTP id MAA07103
> 	for <mary_jacobs@udlp.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 12:07:01 -0600 (CST)
> Received: from default [216.1.196.20] by paonline.com
>   (SMTPD32-4.07) id A015D0CF01DC; Wed, 03 Feb 1999 13:06:13 EST
> Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990203130611.007a0630@POP.paonline.com>
> X-Sender: phyllisbyers@POP.paonline.com
> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 13:06:11 -0500
> To: mary_jacobs@udlp.com
> Subject: Re: Fwd:charge forr using internet
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List |  http://www.backcountry.net  *

==============================================================================