[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: [at-l] Doubles?
Sorry to all. Rushing around today. Didn't think through all the way.
Small, even innocent, bit of humor seemed a bit twisted as soon as I
hit <send>. Not helpful. ...........
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: [at-l] Doubles?
Author: "Alice Kauzlarich" <kauzlar@madison.main.nc.us> at ima
Date: 12/1/98 2:28 PM
Did you send this twice? I got same message, same addresses, just one
minute apart.
The Highlander
----------
> From: Thomas McGinnis <tmcginnis@ucclan.state.in.us>
> To: at-l@backcountry.net; Ryan K. Brooks <ryan@inc.net>
> Subject: Re: [at-l] Doubles?
> Date: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 12:46 PM
>
> Nope.
>
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
> Subject: [at-l] Doubles?
> Author: "Ryan K. Brooks" <ryan@inc.net> at ima
> Date: 12/1/98 11:17 AM
>
>
> Please mail me (ryan@inc.net) if you receive two copies of this message.
>
> Ryan
>
>
> * From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | http://www.backcountry.net
*
> * From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | http://www.backcountry.net *
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | http://www.backcountry.net *
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List | http://www.backcountry.net *
==============================================================================