[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: [at-l] Doubles?



     Sorry to all. Rushing around today. Didn't think through all the way. 
     Small, even innocent, bit of humor seemed a bit twisted as soon as I 
     hit <send>. Not helpful. ...........


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: [at-l] Doubles?
Author:  "Alice Kauzlarich" <kauzlar@madison.main.nc.us> at ima
Date:    12/1/98 2:28 PM


Did you send this twice? I got same message, same addresses, just one
minute apart.

 The Highlander


                                                      

----------
> From: Thomas McGinnis <tmcginnis@ucclan.state.in.us>
> To: at-l@backcountry.net; Ryan K. Brooks <ryan@inc.net>
> Subject: Re: [at-l] Doubles?
> Date: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 12:46 PM
> 
>      Nope.
> 
> 
> ______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
> Subject: [at-l] Doubles?
> Author:  "Ryan K. Brooks" <ryan@inc.net> at ima
> Date:    12/1/98 11:17 AM
> 
> 
> Please mail me (ryan@inc.net) if you receive two copies of this message.
> 
> Ryan
> 
> 
> * From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List |  http://www.backcountry.net 
*
> * From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List |  http://www.backcountry.net  *
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List |  http://www.backcountry.net  *
* From the Appalachian Trail Mailing List |  http://www.backcountry.net  *

==============================================================================